ActualChristianMusic
Read in

Romans 6:13 vs. “Take My Life and Let It Be”

Frances Ridley Havergal (recorded by Reawaken Hymns) · checked 2026-08-21

What we checked

PassageRomans 6:13 chapter ↗
Translation shownBSB (Berean Standard Bible)
Presents itself asinspired-by
Categorynot a quote
AlbumHymns of the Spirit (Reawaken Hymns) · 2022
Words addressed toGod, person unspecified
Teaching or experienceexperience (the singer’s story)

Graded against the standard

Quotation criteria not graded: this song never presents its words as scripture

Applies to every song the Name held holy · God shown holy · true of God · the standard

✓Reverent treatment

✓ What's good

  • The offering is itemised rather than general: hands, feet, voice, lips, will and heart are named one at a time, so a singer can tell what was actually handed over
  • Nothing is presented as scripture and no verse is cited, so it never says it is quoting that needs checking
  • Every petition is addressed to God, and each is paired with a purpose that points back to Him rather than to the singer
  • Its picture of the body's parts given over one by one sits closer to Romans 6:13 than the single whole-body offering of Romans 12:1 does
  • The writer is documented acting on the costliest stanza. UMC Discipleship quotes an 1878 letter in which Havergal describes shipping her ornaments and a jewel cabinet to the Church Missionary House

⚠ Cautions

  • The recording checked sings five of the six original stanzas. The one left out is the silver, gold and intellect stanza, which is the only place money and the mind appear in the list
  • Romans 6:13 works by contrast, naming two possible recipients and refusing one. The hymn names one recipient and no rival, so the alternative the verse argues against is not in view
  • Romans 6:13 grounds its command in something already done, being brought from death to life. The hymn makes its requests without stating that ground
  • The verse's imperative is addressed to the hearer, who does the presenting. The hymn asks God to do the taking. Both are things a Christian may pray, but only one of them is what Romans 6:13 tells the reader to do
  • The hymn's first printing carried a heading from 2 Samuel 19:30. The Romans associations come from later indexes and commentators, not from Havergal's own page

Verse Proof

Romans 6:13

The text in BSB (Berean Standard Bible)

“Do not present the parts of your body to sin as instruments of wickedness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life; and present the parts of your body to Him as instruments of righteousness.”

Paul is writing to the church at Rome, and chapter 6 opens with a question he puts himself: should we go on sinning so that grace increases. The answer runs through an argument that believers were united with Christ in His death and raised with Him, and are therefore dead to sin and alive to God. Verse 13 is where that argument turns into instruction. It gives two commands with one contrast between them: do not hand the parts of your body over to sin, and do hand yourselves and those same parts over to God. The reason attached is not effort but status, that these are people who have been brought from death to life. In both halves of the verse, the one doing the presenting is the reader.

What the song says, described not quoted

A prayer built entirely out of requests, each one asking God to take something. It begins with the whole life, then the singer's moments and days, then works through the body a part at a time: the hands, the feet, the voice, the lips. In Havergal's original text it goes on to ask for money and for the mind, then turns to the will and the heart, and closes with love and with the self. Every request carries a purpose clause: the hands moved by God's love, the feet sent out, the voice singing for its King, the lips carrying His messages, the heart made His throne, and a final line that gives everything only to Him. No verse is quoted and no reference is given. The recording checked here sings five of the six original stanzas, and the one it leaves out is the stanza about silver, gold and intellect.

Nothing was taken from Romans 6:13 and reworded, because nothing was taken from it. What the two share is a method. Both treat the body as a set of parts that can be handed over rather than as one undifferentiated thing, and both attach a purpose to the handing over. Three things run differently. The verse's verb belongs to the reader and the hymn's belongs to God. The verse sets two possible recipients against each other and the hymn has only one. And the hymn's list does not stop at the body, since moments, days, money, intellect, will, love and the self are all on it, and none of those is what Romans 6:13 means by the parts of the body.

· Not a quote: The hymn presents nothing as scripture and cites no verse. It shares Romans 6:13's picture of the body's parts handed over one at a time. But the verse commands the hearer to present them. The hymn asks God to take them.

▸ Official upload. Now listen with the proof in mind.

Havergal handed over hands, feet, voice and lips one at a time. The list is what makes it checkable.

Consecration songs are the ones people sing with their hands open at the front of a room, and they are usually the vaguest songs in the set. This one is not vague. It names hands, feet, voice, lips, money, mind, will and heart, one at a time, which means a singer can find out afterwards whether they meant it. That specificity is also why a missing stanza is worth noticing here more than it would be elsewhere: when the list is the whole method, a shorter list is a smaller offering.

Sung on repeat, this song moves between God and the singer.

What repetition plants here is an inventory. Sing it enough times and consecration stops being one large word and becomes a list you can walk down: hands, then feet, then voice, then lips, then will, then heart. That is a specific thing to plant, and it stays checkable in a way a general surrender does not.

The dwelling tag is mixed for a countable reason. Almost every noun in this hymn belongs to the singer, and almost every verb belongs to God, so the words are about the singer's own faculties while the action and the destination are His.

The other half of the repeat test is what never gets sung. This arrangement leaves out the stanza about silver, gold and intellect, and a list forms you only around the items it contains. Havergal is recorded acting on that exact stanza four years after writing it. If you loop this one, it is worth finding the full text and putting the missing stanza back in your own mouth.

Two Romans texts get named around this hymn, and they do different jobs. Romans 12:1 asks for the body as one living sacrifice, a single undivided offering. Romans 6:13 speaks of the parts of the body, handed over as instruments. Havergal's method is the second one. Her text is an itemised list, each item with its own purpose attached, which is closer to the members of Romans 6:13 than to the whole body of Romans 12:1.

The reference works do not settle on either. Hymnary's scripture index for this text lists Romans 6:13-22 and Romans 12:1-2 alongside dozens of other passages. The Hymnology Archive traces individual couplets elsewhere again, sending the feet to Isaiah 52:7 or Romans 10:15, the lips to Psalm 51:15, the silver and gold to the widow's mite, and the intellect to 1 Corinthians 6:19. Havergal's own first printing carried a heading from none of these. It came from 2 Samuel 19:30, Mephibosheth telling David to take everything.

So the honest finding is that this is an anthology of allusions with a Mephibosheth heading over it, not a setting of any one verse. Romans 6:13 is the closest single match for its method, and it is still not its source.

Corrections

No corrections to this proof yet.

Think we got something wrong? Tell us what and where, and we will check it against the text. Real errors get fixed here, dated, in public. Every correction on the site →

262 songs checked so far. Nothing for the song you want? Ask us to check it.