ActualChristianMusic
Read in

Luke 1:30-35 vs. “Mary, Did You Know?”

· checked 2026-08-21

What we checked

PassageLuke 1:30-35 chapter ↗
Translation shownBSB (Berean Standard Bible)
Presents itself asinspired-by
Categorynot a quote
AlbumThat’s Christmas to Me · 2014
Words addressed tonot addressed to God (sung about Him)
Teaching or experienceteaching (states truths)

Graded against the standard

Quotation criteria not graded: this song never presents its words as scripture

Applies to every song the Name held holy · God shown holy · true of God · the standard

✓Reverent treatment

✓ What's good

  • Never says it is quoting, anywhere: no verse cited, no scripture framing, nothing offered as the Bible's own words
  • Everything the questions say about the child is something the Gospels report, from the miracles to the titles
  • The subject is Jesus from the first question to the last. Mary is the one addressed, never the one described
  • The writer has publicly pointed at the chapter himself, saying he hopes the song sends people to Luke 1 to find out what Mary knew

⚠ Cautions

  • The scene is Luke 1 and the content is not. Sung often enough, the questions can become the remembered tone of a chapter that Luke wrote as an announcement
  • Mary's own words sit in the same chapter, at verses 38 and 46-55, and the song gives no signal that they are there
  • It is addressed to a person, not to God. That is fine for a carol and worth noticing when it is used as congregational worship, because the singing teaches about Christ without speaking to Him
  • One line, about the child delivering His mother, has been challenged by Catholic writers on Immaculate Conception grounds. See the analysis below for what Luke 1:47 does with that

Verse Proof

Luke 1:30-35

The text in BSB (Berean Standard Bible)

“So the angel told her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. Behold, you will conceive and give birth to a son, and you are to give Him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give Him the throne of His father David, and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever. His kingdom will never end!” “How can this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel replied, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the Holy One to be born will be called the Son of God.”

Gabriel is speaking to Mary at Nazareth, before the conception, before anything in the nativity has happened. What he gives her is an announcement with specifics in it: the child's name, that He will be called Son of the Most High, that God will give Him David's throne, that His reign will not end, and that the Holy One born of her will be called the Son of God. Mary asks one question, about how this is possible for a virgin, and is answered. Three verses later she calls herself the Lord's servant and consents (Luke 1:38), and in the same chapter she sings her own song, in which she calls God her Savior (Luke 1:46-48). Luke does not present the annunciation as a mystery Mary was left inside. He presents it as something she was told.

What the song says, described not quoted

The song is a run of questions put to Mary about the child she is holding, written by Mark Lowry in 1984 and set to Buddy Greene's music in 1991. The questions ask whether she knows what this son will do and who He is: that He will walk on water, still a storm, give sight to the blind and hearing to the deaf and steps to the lame, that He will one day save her, and that the sleeping infant in her arms is the Lord of creation, heaven's Lamb, and the great I AM. Nothing is quoted. No verse is cited anywhere in the song. The words are addressed to a woman inside the story rather than to God, which is unusual for a song sung in church, and the whole text is built out of question marks rather than statements.

The setting is the nativity and almost none of the content is. What the questions list are events reported later in the Gospels, plus titles gathered from across the canon. Hymnary indexes the text against roughly a dozen passages, and the annunciation is not one of them: the list runs through the storm and water-walking accounts, the healings, Simeon in Luke 2, and Revelation 5. PraiseCharts, working from the publisher's chart, names Matthew 11:5, Luke 2:11 and Isaiah 9:6. So the only thing the song takes from Luke 1 is the scene, a woman holding a promised child. What it does not take is the announcement Gabriel made in it.

· Not a quote: The song cites no verse and presents no words as scripture, and everything its questions say about the child is something the Gospels say too.

▸ Official upload. Now listen with the proof in mind.

The chapter the song is set in is the chapter that answers it.

For a lot of people this song is now the mental picture of the nativity, which makes the gap between its frame and its chapter worth naming. Nothing in it misquotes, because it never quotes. The thing at stake is the scene's mood. Luke wrote verses 30 to 35 as a plain announcement and verse 38 as a settled yes, and a song built entirely out of questions to Mary can quietly reset the memory to uncertainty. That matters most for the people who know the carol far better than they know the chapter, which by now is most of us.

Sung on repeat, this song fixes your attention on God.

What repetition plants here is the identity of the child, stated again and again under the cover of a question: healer, Lord of creation, Lamb, I AM. That is a good set of sentences to have running in your head through December, and it is why the dwelling tag is God rather than mixed. Every line is about Him. The one thing looping this song cannot plant is Mary's own answer, because the song does not contain it. Read Luke 1:38 and 46-55 next to it and the picture is whole: a woman told plainly who her son would be, who said yes, and who then sang. Luke also records her still turning things over years later (2:19, 2:51) and being amazed at Simeon's words (2:33). Told plainly, still marvelling. Both are in the text.

The argument about this song is real, documented, and worth laying out, because it is a context argument rather than a quotation one.

The objection. Holly Scheer, writing in The Federalist in 2016, argues directly from Luke 1:30-35 that the Bible plainly tells us Mary knew, and sends readers to the Magnificat instead as the song Mary sings for herself. Joy Clarkson's version of the same point, reported by Christianity Today, is that the question is therefore either redundant or condescending. Both objections rest on the passage above, and on that narrow point the passage is with them. Gabriel names the child, names Him Son of the Most High and Son of God, and promises Him an unending reign. That is not vague.

The defence. Timothy Koch, also in The Federalist, argues that the questions are rhetorical, a standard poetic device, and that read as such the song affirms rather than doubts: Jesus as saviour, as sharing the Father's nature, as Lord over creation, as the Lamb. He also notes that John the Baptist, who had every reason to be certain, still sent to ask (Matthew 11). Karl Erickson's defence, cited on Wikipedia, is that the song should be received as a song and not a theological essay.

The writer. Mark Lowry has answered this in public more than once. He acknowledges the song has shortcomings, says he never meant to start a war or irritate people, describes the voice he was writing in as an overly enthusiastic angel, and says he hopes the song sends people running to Luke 1 to find out what Mary knew.

What is provable. Two things, and they do not cancel. Luke 1:30-35 is an announcement with content, and Luke 1:38 is a consent, so "Mary was told" is simply what the chapter says. Luke also records her treasuring and pondering afterward (2:19, 2:51) and both parents amazed at Simeon (2:33), so "she was still taking it in" is also what the text says. The disputed line about the child delivering His mother is the one place the song touches doctrine directly, and Luke 1:47 is the relevant verse: Mary calls God her Savior in her own song. Whatever else is argued about that line, it is not saying something Luke's Mary would not say.

Corrections

No corrections to this proof yet.

Think we got something wrong? Tell us what and where, and we will check it against the text. Real errors get fixed here, dated, in public. Every correction on the site →

262 songs checked so far. Nothing for the song you want? Ask us to check it.