ActualChristianMusic
Read in

2 Peter 1:4 vs. “Standing on the Promises”

R. Kelso Carter (recorded by Alan Jackson) · checked 2026-08-22

What we checked

Passage2 Peter 1:4 chapter ↗
Translation shownBSB (Berean Standard Bible)
Presents itself asinspired-by
Categorynot a quote
AlbumPrecious Memories · 2006
Words addressed tonot addressed to God (sung about Him)
Teaching or experiencemixed

Graded against the standard

Quotation criteria not graded: this song never presents its words as scripture

Applies to every song the Name held holy · God shown holy · true of God · the standard

✓Reverent treatment

✓ What's good

  • Never says it is quoting. No chapter, verse, or translation is named, and nothing in the text is presented as scripture
  • Its central statement is one scripture makes plainly. 2 Peter 1:4 calls the promises precious and magnificent, and the hymn's confidence in them is not overstated
  • The object of the singer's confidence sits outside the singer. The refrain stands on something God said, not on the quality of the standing
  • The text is fully documented and in the public domain. Author, year, first publication, and tune are all on the record and easy to check
  • Hymnary's scripture index for this text lists 2 Peter 1:3-4 among its references, so the pairing on this page is one the hymnological record already makes
  • The recording presents itself as what it is, a record of familiar hymns, and not as a scripture setting

⚠ Cautions

  • The word “promises” is the hymn's spine and is never filled in. No covenant, no passage, and no particular word of God is named in any stanza
  • 2 Peter 1:4 states what the promises are for, that its readers become partakers of the divine nature and escape corruption. The hymn's stanzas do not reach that clause
  • The stanza closest to the verse's purpose, the one on cleansing and Christian liberty, is the one most modern hymnals drop. The four-stanza version many congregations sing sits a step further from 2 Peter's sentence than the 1886 text did
  • Popular retellings tie the hymn to a healing experience in Carter's life. One hymn reference states that reliable early evidence does not establish it. Treat that story as unverified
  • This recording runs 1:35, so it is abridged, and which stanzas it keeps was not confirmed from a printed source for this proof

Verse Proof

2 Peter 1:4

The text in BSB (Berean Standard Bible)

“Through these He has given us His precious and magnificent promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, now that you have escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires.”

Peter is writing to people he says have received a faith as precious as his own, and this verse is the second half of a single argument that begins in verse 3. Verse 3 states the ground: God's divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness, through the knowledge of the One who called us by His own glory and excellence. Verse 4 hangs on that. “Through these” points back to the glory and excellence just named, so the promises have a stated source. They also have a stated purpose, and it is written as a clause: so that through them the readers may become partakers of the divine nature, now that they have escaped the corruption in the world caused by evil desires. Peter does not stop at the promise. Verse 5 opens “For this very reason” and lists what the readers are to add to their faith: virtue, knowledge, self-control, perseverance, godliness, brotherly kindness, love. Verse 9 says the person who lacks these has forgotten that he was cleansed from his past sins. In this paragraph the promises are a supply issued for a task.

What the song says, described not quoted

The hymn is R. Kelso Carter's, published in Philadelphia in 1886 in the collection “Songs of Perfect Love,” which he co-edited, and set to his own tune, named PROMISES. The refrain is in the first person and returns after every stanza: the singer declares that he is standing on the promises of God. The original text ran to five stanzas. Hymn references describe their subjects as praise for Christ's kingship and eternal glory, confidence through seasons of doubt and fear, cleansing and Christian liberty, being bound to Christ in love and helped by the Spirit, and reliance on God as the singer's whole sufficiency. Most modern hymnals print four of the five and drop the cleansing stanza. No book, chapter, or verse is cited anywhere in the hymn, and no stanza names a particular promise, covenant, or passage. Alan Jackson's recording, track ten of “Precious Memories,” runs one minute thirty-five seconds and so carries only part of the printed text.

Nothing here is offered as scripture, so nothing has shifted inside a quotation. What the hymn and the verse share is a noun. What they do with it differs in two measurable ways. 2 Peter 1:4 gives its promises a source, “through these,” pointing back to the glory and excellence of verse 3, and a purpose, written as a clause: that the readers may share in the divine nature, having escaped corruption. The hymn supplies neither. Its promises have no named content, and what follows from them across its stanzas is a posture. Standing, trusting, singing. Peter's own conclusion runs the other way. He writes “For this very reason” and then lists seven things to add to faith. Both responses are biblical. Only one of them is the response this verse draws from its own sentence.

· Not a quote: The hymn cites no passage and presents nothing as scripture. Its confidence that God's promises hold is one 2 Peter 1:4 shares. But the verse names both where the promises come from and what they were given to accomplish. No stanza of the hymn names either.

▸ Official upload. Now listen with the proof in mind.

2 Peter 1:4 does not only say the promises are sure. It says what they are for.

A promise left unfilled gets filled by the singer, and a promise left unexplained gets sung as though its purpose were the singer's security. 2 Peter 1:4 is more specific than that and more demanding. The promises are the means by which people come to share in the divine nature and get clear of corruption. On those terms, standing on them is not a resting place. It is a supply line, and verses 5 through 11 are what Peter builds on it. Nothing in the hymn reaches that far, which is not an error in the hymn. It is a reason to read the sentence the hymn is standing on.

Sung on repeat, this song moves between God and the singer.

What a loop of this plants is a stance. The refrain is first person and returns after every stanza, so the sentence being memorised is about where the singer is standing, and the promises are the floor under it rather than the thing in view. That is why the dwelling tag here is mixed. The stanzas are about Christ and about God's word, and the refrain that repeats after each of them is about the singer's own footing.

The floor is a good one. A settled confidence that God keeps His word is worth having drilled in, and it is better drilled in by singing than by arguing. The question repetition raises is what the floor is made of. Sung with 2 Peter 1:4 in mind, the promises underfoot have content and a direction. They are the supply for becoming like God and getting clear of corruption, and standing on them is the beginning of moving. Sung with the word left open, the same refrain settles into a general reassurance about how things will turn out, and the standing has nowhere to go. The hymn will hold either. The verse decides which.

Carter's life is unusually well documented for a hymn writer, and the record matters here because it is a record about promises. He graduated from the Pennsylvania Military Academy in 1867 and taught there afterwards. In 1884, two years before this hymn was printed, he published “The Atonement for Sin and Sickness,” which argued that physical healing is included in Christ's atoning work. In 1897 he published “Faith Healing Reviewed After Twenty Years,” in which he revisited that position and described healing by faith in this age as a matter of special favour under the leading of the Spirit rather than a term of the atonement. He later worked as a physician and died in 1928. Two published books thirteen years apart, describing in different terms what God has promised about healing. That is a documented change in a published position and nothing more is claimed about the man here.

Sources also disagree about the hymn's circumstances. One account places the writing during a period of ill health, another places it at the military academy, and a third says the early evidence does not establish the healing story usually attached to it. None of that is needed for the finding. What the biography does show is why a specified promise is worth more than an unspecified one. The hymn's word stayed open for a century and a half, and its author spent a decade and a half publicly working out which promises about healing he thought God had actually made. 2 Peter 1:4 is the other kind of sentence. It says where the promises come from, what they are, and what they are for, in one line, so that nobody has to guess.

Corrections

  1. The bottom line read "never says it is scripture as scripture" and had done since 2026-08-25, when a sweep retiring the word "claim" replaced "claims nothing" inside "claims nothing as scripture". It now reads "presents nothing as scripture", the sentence's original meaning. No finding changed.

Think we got something wrong? Tell us what and where, and we will check it against the text. Real errors get fixed here, dated, in public. Every correction on the site →

262 songs checked so far. Nothing for the song you want? Ask us to check it.